After 19 years of teaching, I decided to not include a participation and attendance mark. I did have people sign in to assess attendance unofficially. But, what I really wanted to see is if not having participation marks made a difference. Oh, it did. And, the biggest proof is in the marks. I have taught my Gender and Politics course numerous times during my academic career at four universities and I can confidently say that there was a noticeable change in the students’ attendance and their assignments.
- Attendance was mediocre at best. And, by not attending announcements were not heard regarding assignments. My syllabus is lengthy, but I speak to each assignment in more depth during a class meeting.
- My office hours were not as busy as usual. While some might think that this is a good thing–it’s not. Office hours are important. This is when many students will get the check in to make sure that they are on the right track or the chance to chat about their assignments.
- Overall, the marks were the lowest that I have ever seen. Now, they were not terrible, but 3-5 points lower than usual.
My takeaway is that by not having a participation and attendance mark some students do not feel the pressure to come to class, to show up. I’m teaching in the again and I’m going to have a participation and attendance mark. My students benefit from it. I’m going to ask them to show up!
Makes you wonder just where their commitment really lies… Isn’t success 95% guaranteed in life by simply showing up?
Yes, Shane! Surprisingly some have noted that they prefer when I take roll.
It comes back to the notion of scaffolding around education. This confirms that we do need some structure to support effective learning.