Summer Courses~ Post-Mortem

I always like to think about my courses after the grades are submitted. What worked. What did not. What did I learn. This Summer term I taught Poli 103: The Worlds of Politics and Poli 433: Politics and Popular Culture. Both courses ended up with two dozen students, which was odd considering that the first usually enrolls at 180-225 during the others school terms.

What worked: I borrowed a tactic from my colleague, Dr. Michael Webb. The syllabus stated that a student could not pass the class unless 70% of the courses were attended. So, yes, I did take roll. And, this was not for mere attendance, but also for participation. I do have an area for evaluation where roughly 5-20% of the students’ mark is assessed based on their quality participation. This worked well. Every student who completed the course attended the requisite number of courses or more. Now, some students’ engagement and participation in the course varied. But, by and large most participated some. It is hard and unfair to compare the courses, since one is a first year level course and the other is a fourth year seminar.

What did not work: Popplet. I could see from the students’ faces that many of them had a hard time following Popplet. I’m a visual learner and I like outlines, mind mapping, and brainstorming. Popplet did not work for all or even most of the students. I think the branches were too thin and didn’t catch them.

Related to this, I think that many liked my use of Prezi and I know that the majority really found the Slide Rocket slides useful. I am not surprised. The Slide Rocket slides had slightly more information on them and would offer them visual cues of sort back to the course materials, while the Prezi presentations were really about the concepts and less for them to hurriedly type or write down!

The students like that they have a choice with one of the major seminar assignments.  Specifically, I have a creative project and the students have the option of putting together a zine, blog or vlog. This term more students opted for the zine compared to last term and I am not sure why this was the case. Regardless, some wonderful zines were submitted, as well as some interesting blogs. The blogs varied in terms of quality and part of this was not just web savvy, but really about the students’ writing and creative analysis. Some obviously spent more time thinking and refining their blog posts.

Overall, I do think that the courses were successful and I look forward to the official course experience surveys (the evaluations), but I will add that the half dozen emails thanking me for the course(s) have been saved and will go in my reappointment file!

Fri Fun Facts

In the continued spirit of sharing quirky thoughts, here goes another Friday Fun Facts.

1. I am going to Comic Con in San Diego this month ( #SDCC11 ) with @pipsipirate and lots of other people. No, I’m not dressing up in a complete outfit or uniform. Yes, I might take my Gryffindor polo. I’m going as a Participant-Observer. I’m going to get more information about fandom studies for my Poli 433: Politics and Popular Culture course. Fun.

2. I am also going to BlogHer and this will also be in San Diego, but in August. Again, I’m looking forward to a work related event to network and have opportunities to learn more about women and technology. I am hoping to offer a new course in 2012 or 2013 related to Social Media and Politics. I don’t have the snappy title worked out yet, so it’s currently SMP in my mind.

3. Since I really dig my job a working “vacation” is not a problem. I’m going to two conferences for research, teaching, learning and network. Not too bad!

4. I was really lucky that the Western Political Science Association’s 2011 meeting in San Antonio, TX coincided with the annual Popular Culture conference in the same city. I attended panels related to Young Adult literature (Harry Potter, Hunger Games and Twilight), as well as other panels related to Pop Culture and Politics. Yet another example of how Political Science is a vast field that include this sort of work and interests. Yeah, that’s right–we do more than analyze election results. But, hey, that is important, too.

5. Next year, Weedonverse is at UBC in July 2012. I think I’ll be there.

I hope that you enjoyed today’s Fun Facts. And, for all the Canadians out there–Happy Canada Day!

Reasons Why I Love(d) and Miss the Re-Imagined #BSG

How do I count the ways? I was recently in Seattle with my family and we visited the Experience Music Project for the second or third time. This time was primarily so we could visit the Battlestar Galactica #BSG exhibit. We were not disappointed. But, the exhibit did make me think about the exhibit and some of the reasons why the series resonated with me. The first point I need to add is that I had ear-marked the series as a Summer catch up, but then read a colleague’s interpretation of the series and decided that I needed to watch the series. There are some spoilers below, so please be warned. Spoiler Alerts.

I appreciate science fiction as a genre, but add to this a dystopic setting (future or past) and I am apt to find something interesting in the story. #BSG did not disappoint and it was filmed locally in Vancouver, BC. And, this caused some excitement to try to find places that looked familiar. And, I recalled from the earlier series that the Cylons really freaked me out, but these new Cylons–some were human! How could this happen. Well, I set out to find out with the re-imagined series.

The plot focuses on the last battlestar and rest of the fleet that survives an attack. What we find is that the Education Secretary becomes President (notice, not Prime Minister) of the surviving fleet, as they try to survive and find a new place (possibly Earth) to live. She leads the people to the best of her ability, but constantly finds herself in opposition to the military tactics at the hand of the Admiral. The characters prove interesting. We see that there are lots of strong women characters in the series and that the leads come from different ethnic backgrounds, as well.

The episodes, though, also touch on different topics that vary from understanding what it means to be human, to discussing war, religion, sexual assault, and feuds between different people to name just five rather quickly. Likewise, the series did so while entertaining the viewer. #BSG gave a new meaning to toasters and “what the frack.” Several social scientists have spoken to the series applying theories to certain episodes and I have had conversations about the issues of collective security and the responsibility to protect. That is, there is something there within the series that speaks to political philosophy and political science at large.

Because of all the things that I’ve shared rather quickly and incompletely, I miss the series. And, by this I do mean the re-imagined series. I did watch the original in the late 1970s with my two younger brothers, but only recall that it seemed rather cheesy. I was glad that Starbuck in the new #BSG was a woman with enough bravado for a few men. Starbuck embodies masculinity and militarism with her brash attitude and strength of character, but she is also human–she is flawed and her past haunts her. So many feminist viewers have identified with her.

The Cylons in this series are also “skin jobs”, since some of them are human looking and are sleeper agents and don’t know that they are Cylons until they switch. Then, of course, some are human looking and are well aware that they are Cylons. One of the interesting episodes is about Helena Cain–who offers the viewer another complicated woman. She is the captain of the Pegasus and when we find her it appears that this strong female leader has a thoroughly cruel streak. What is the viewer to make that the Cain has allowed a sleeper agent, (Gina a clone of Six) her former lover, to be broken and degraded by “any means necessary”? This is when some viewers might feel a sense of empathy toward her former lover, and then do a double take and think, “Wait, am I feeling bad for the toasters?” Right. Even typing that sentence made me smirk, since this might sound ridiculous to the uninitiated to the #BSG series. Well, hopefully this blog post wasn’t fracking rambling. So say we all.

Fri Facts

Fun things to do in Seattle

1. Pacific Science Center

2. Experience Music Project –current special exhibits are #BSG, Nirvana/Punk, and Avatar (in Science Fiction Museum)

3. Space Needle

4. Pikes Place Market

5. Seattle Art Museum

6. Mariners Baseball Game at Safeco Field

7. U Dub Campus (University of Washington)

8. Seattle Zoo

9. Seattle Aquarium

10. Blue Water Taco Grill

11. Silver Cloud Hotel (across from Safeco and Qwest)

The City Pass http://www.citypass.com/seattle is worth it if you go to approximately four of the six places. Some info can be found via: http://www.visitseattle.org/Home.aspx This is the Pacific Northwest, so pack an umbrella!

The above list are all places that we’ve been and enjoyed. Enjoy!

Guest Speakers in the Classroom

During the last few years, I’ve invited advanced graduate students, former students, and colleagues to give presentations in my classes. And, for the most part this has worked well. It’s good to give the graduate students an opportunity to present their research in a relatively small, safe space. They get a line on their CV and I can write a letter of support. Having community members come in is also instructive, since most students become insulated in the campus community and at times forget about the vibrant larger community that the campus is only one part of.

Having colleagues in the classroom is also useful to demonstrate to the students that there is a community of scholars on campus or in the region. This might widen their understanding of the materials or at the very least impart this sense that the instructor is part of a community. The other reason to invite a guest is to have someone else come in and speak to their particular areas of interest and expertise that are usually different from you own. The students get a different perspective on course material. Now, I’m venturing into a different point, but it does fit.

On a related note, I explain to the students that there are approximately one dozen Political Scientists outside of the Political Science department at #UVIC. The only way they might know this is by this announcement. They might realize that they will find other Political Scientists in Women’s Studies, Environmental Studies, Education, and Indigenous Governance to name a few at #UVIC. Likewise, I will announce these colleagues upcoming courses, so that students in the department can take more upper division courses outside of the department. They need to take the courses anyway–so why not share information? Why not make suggestions?

The guest speaker can also pique students’ curiosity to learn more about the information. Maybe this is a form of intellectual networking for the speaker, but for the student it is an educational moment for them to learn more.

Managing the Classroom: Teaching Race and Gender

It is a constant struggle to teach diversity in the classroom. I am finding that as soon as I think that the rules of engagement are understood, I get reminded that they are not. In a perfect situation the classroom environment will include trust, respect, and an understanding that knee jerk opinions are not part of intellectual discussion. However, I find that occasionally I get “schooled” by some comments that give me pause.

This term I am teaching a Youth Politics seminar with less than two dozen third through fifth years and Gender and International Relations with less than sixty students. I am also managing and co-teaching a course with 225 students and will speak to situations that I have encountered. To protect my students and myself, these scenarios will be reflective of the last year and not necessarily this particular term.

When I am teaching touchy subjects like gender and race, I find that I have to be ready for different types of reactions. There are the students who feel validated by the reading and other students who feel challenged, sceptical or even angry. I lead my classes in a lecture and discussion format, so I engage with the students and their comments lots. I am a strong believer that they are part of the learning team in the classroom: texts, lectures, current events, and student discussion. There are costs to not lecturing and leaving the classroom. I engage the students more and because of this—they have more opportunity to participate. I will not change this, as I find that this is how I teach.

Lately, I have been most challenged with the responses to students’ reaction and use of language. I strongly adhere to the idea that language is powerful and certain words are “loaded” in the same way that certain topics are value-laden. This is not a shared sentiment by all students. I need to check myself and remember that I am also there to facilitate discussion, engage student interest, and, oh yes, teach materials. There is usually a student or two has an “anything” goes sort of attitude and I have to balance all the students’ needs and my own politics. This presents a challenge.

I find that the one thing that I have no patience for is overt racism. Even typing up this sentence reminds me that I have issues with covert racism, too. Oh, choosing our battles in the classroom is tricky. I can easily engage with discussions of gender, but race. I find that the overt racism can make my heart skip a beat. I cannot explain if this is because of the fact that I am a Latina teaching a mostly homogenous student population or if it’s more. Whatever it is, it is compounded by the fact that so many of the Canadian students seem to think that racism is a thing of the past or something that only Americans are guilty of—and in the South, for that matter. And, my friends, these are statements and beliefs that I have heard in my classroom.

Some days it is quite easy, I am at the front of the class walking back and forth juggling ideas, course material, student comments, and student reaction. My love of teaching  keeps me in check and I enjoy seeing the ways in which some students are really excited about the materials. Then, there are other days when one student is out of line or that presents me with a teachable moment. It might be that I need to remind the student about decorum, collegiality, or boundaries. Occasionally I have been known to call a student out and just say, “What you just said was offensive.” Of course, the next thing I do is contextualize the statement and then move on to the next point in the lesson plan or lecture.

It’s these occasional moments, though, that I reply over and over in my mind for the next few hours. I am thinking aloud here and being ever so careful—since this is the blogosphere and any one of my students could google me and find this post. I welcome other educators to give advice about those thorny moments in the classroom.

This post was originally posted on Equality 101, which is now defunct.

Fri Facts

This list of tid-bits is about convocation/graduation.

1. I enjoy attending to celebrate the students’ success

2. It’s nice to meet siblings, parents, and other loved ones

3. It’s also great to get that last photo of the grad

4. I’ve teared up at the last two ceremonies

5. As the student walks by I remember her/his work in the class and wish the student luck (silently)

6. Attending the ceremony is one of the best parts of my job each year

7. Did I mention that I also love my University of California regalia? The robes are beautiful

8. Two days a year (Nov and June) #UVIC looks like Hogwarts

9. This year I brought my phone and took some photos

10. I also tweeted from the ceremony, but only a few times

For Profit Education

This post was posted originally on Equality 101, which is now defunct. My thoughts have not changed much on the topic of for profit education institutions.

I was catching up on the  Los Angeles Times and came across an article about higher education in the Business section. Reporter Michael Hiltzik’s article covers the intersection between education and profit. Essentially, neoliberalization’s claws have grabbed further into higher education. The article discusses how the state governments are outsourcing services in order to save money. However, the costs are going to be placed squarely on the shoulders of the students and their parents. This situation is not unique to California, as one can pore through The Chronicle of Higher Education to read about similar situations in other states.

What is California doing? The state of California is in financial straits and the higher education sector is feeling the pinch. The community college system is now going to outsource college courses to Kaplan University, who offers their courses online. Kaplan’s courses will be convenient, as they are online. However, even with a 42% discount for the community college student, the Kaplan course will be almost $600 more than a commensurate course at the community college.  One Kaplan course can cost almost as a year’s worth of courses at a California community college! I guess that one can argue that the market (students/learners) are willing to pay for this service (education).

Students will be hard pressed to find another option, yet if they are under pressure to enter a four year university for the next term, they will have few options. Who benefits? Kaplan. And, if we look at the high cost of education across the United States, we also will see that the majority of students at the community college are students who are trying to save money during those first few years at university. The most vulnerable are going to be charged these extra fees, when they have no other options. I don’t like this one bit, as I think it is a marked difference for a student to attempt to pick up other credits.  But, having the community college outsource to Kaplan for services (courses) that they should be providing really makes my blood boil.

Certainly, California can do better for the less than two million students enrolled in the system. With the four-year university tuitions going up 10-30% across the state, more students will enroll in the community college system. It is no surprise that this decision was just announced during the time when most students are working, so that they cannot mobilize a mass protest. With these sorts of neoliberal policies, the states’ responsibility and investment in higher education shrinks. But, lower middle-class families, and working class families will pay for this. In my opinion it is shameful to make higher education harder for more students to pursue.

This also means that the student will have to enroll in an online course and this will not work for all students. Some students need the face-to-face experience in order to get as much out of the class and interact with an instructor and classmates. I am an undergraduate advisor at my institution, and I have found that more than 50% of the students in my office state that their online course experience was dreadful. The very motivated student will usually find that an online course worked for them. This is from their anecdotal comments, but worth noting.

Another related issue is that this agreement makes it easier to layoff faculty at the community colleges, as well. This issue includes more than the students and money. It includes faculty and pedagogy. To be sure, I do not have a problem with a student opting to take an occasional online course in order to graduate on time or a blended-learning class, but this current arrangement does not sound like it is really for the students’ benefit.

Fun Facts

This week’s version of facts is less personal and reflects my thoughts at work.

1. I assign a fair bit of reading.

2. I expect students to come to class prepared.

3. I hope that students review the syllabus on more than one occasion.

4. I really, really like my job. Think, talk, advise, and write for a living?!

5. I enjoy mentoring.

6. I enjoy my role as an Undergraduate Advisor.

7. Shoddy work bothers me.

8. When I say that I’m here to help, I mean it.

9. Office hours provides some of the best moments.

10. I respond to student emails promptly.

I doubt these are fun, but offers some insight into what I’m thinking now!

Accommodating Students’ Disabilities

The university where I work at has a Resource Center for Students with a Disability (RCSD). I am usually in contact with the RCSD several times a term and I have had ample opportunity to get to know some of the staff there well. I jokingly referred to the RCSD as an “academic first responders” and a colleague at the office appreciated my acknowledgement of the office’s work. I think it fits, as for some of my students the RCSD is really the first place they need to go to get help with their education. I have students who test out for various reasons: require a distraction free environment, need 1.5 more time for the exam due to dyslexia,  might need access to voice activated software or might have recently been in a car accident and might need more time for their back and or neck comfort.

As long as the student is registered and completes the proper paper work, this is never a problem. What becomes tricky for me as someone without any training in learning disability assessment, is when students do not make use of the RCSD, but can or should be based on their own admission. As faculty, I can encourage student learning in many ways. I use different types of technology for the different learners. I have also suggested the RCSD to some students.

My suggestion of the RCSD to students has been more problematic. There is still a stigma with the term “disability” and some students have taken umbrage with my suggestion. This school year, I had a student leave my office angry with my suggestion that he get assessed at the RCSD, even though he shared how his learning disability was a problem. He did not want to be labelled and I understand this, but I was sad to see him later drop the course.

The policy on campus is that students who have registered and been assessed have access to the RCSD policies and protected rights. A student who is not registered will not be able to have the same accommodations. For instance, some students might have an open-ended note on their assessment letter that is sent to faculty: student might require leniency with due dates. In these situations, we negotiate deadlines. However, without registration at the RCSD deadlines and late penalty assessments are a completely different story.

My point is that I wish students did not feel embarrassed about a learning disability and that more would use the services on campus available to them. Until more do so, their complete needs will not be met on campus and more importantly their grades will reflect this. Ultimately, the forms and grading of an additional exam or two the next day is worth it to accommodate my students and help them be successful in my courses.

I have also had to accommodate students who cannot regularly come to class and this requires more patience, but again the goal is to help a student complete her/his coursework. In these situations, more communication is necessary.

This post originally ran on Equality 101, which is now defunct. It’s an oldie, but a goodie!